10
October 2001
2. "US Warns Iraq Not to Take
Advantage of Sept Attacks", the United States has delivered
a stern warning to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein he would pay a heavy
price if Baghdad took advantage of the crisis surrounding the Sept.
11 attacks, U.S. officials said on Tuesday.
3. "US warns Europe for emphasis
on Turkey", visiting Brussels to enhance cooperation against
terrorism, top-level U.S. officials told their European counterparts
to give emphasis to dialogue with Turkey.
4. "Turkey Asks to Send Troops",
Turkey's government asked parliament Tuesday for permission to contribute
troops to the U.S.-led campaign against terrorism, expressing concern
the fighting could spread beyond Afghan borders.
5. "Turkey and the US discuss
relations with Iraq", columnist Tuncay Ozkan writes on
Turkey's stance concerning a possible attack on Iraq. We give a summary
of his considerations.
6. "Fogg: Amendment only the
beginning", Turkey Representative of the European Union,
Karen Fogg, regards the constitutional amendments recently passed by
Turkish Parliament as insufficient and just a beginning.
1.- Ozgur Politika - "Turmoil does not have any
benefits":
Warning to PUK against Bin Laden "profiteering"
Lately, preparations for war are underway in south Kurdistan.
Following the negative change in the relations between the PUK and the
Islamic movements, who were under PUK's control and cooperated with
it for a long period of time, attention is drawn to future possibilities.
The PUK, who--following the 11 September attacks in the United States--cried
out that the extensions of Usama Bin Ladin were in south Kurdistan and
who subsequently launched a low-scale military operation, is now trying
to collect the fruits of its deeds in Ankara and Washington.
Prior to his departure to Washington, Barham Salah, a PUK official who
acts as PUK prime minister, held talks with officials from the Foreign
Ministry and the General Staff in Ankara.
While he was in Ankara, Salah asserted that Turkey can rely on PUK.
Now he will ask for aid from the United States. A few days earlier,
PDK representative Hosyar Zebari had also passed through Ankara on his
way to Washington. Ankara is taking an interesting course with regard
to its policy toward south Kurdistan. Officials of Turkey, which was
involved in the turmoil in south Kurdistan, are issuing one statement
after another--whatever the reason may be--and maintain that they have
proceeded "with caution." It is known that double tactics
are employed during crises, i.e. to lead to confusion as well as to
ignore.
This is the policy of profiteering. Although the Kurds
should not be involved in such policies, it is impossible to say that
this is true with regard to the south. The PUK, which created a striking
turmoil around Halabjah, drew the attention of the international community
to this region as a result of the "international terrorism"
flame incited by Washington.
In Ankara, PUK's Salah conveyed the message that stated:
"Close cooperation with secular and democratic Turkey is to our
benefit. We understand Turkey's security related and political concerns.
We are committed to Iraq's territorial integrity." He added: "The
11 September attack will affect the Kurds and Iraq in various ways,
and it appears that the Middle East will be the major battlefield in
the struggle against terrorism. We are looking for an answer to the
question concerning the options of US policy."
Following this statement, it is definite that Salah will
be asking Washington for some financial reward and credit as well as
military aid, on account of his "service" and "loyalty."
Salah's statements are indicative of this. PUK may be asking the United
States to send ground troops to south Kurdistan. The United States,
which has activated its army and war
technology worldwide and which spends billions of dollars for intelligence
and military
units, probably will not act ungenerously and will look after the PUK.
The meeting that will be held between the joint delegation
of PDK and PUK and the officials
from the Secretary of State and the National Security Council offices
is one of the most
important parts of Washington talks. In this meeting the Americans will
probably ask the
two parties to be ready for a possible air and ground operation against
Iraq.
At this point, the situation in south Kurdistan is an
important issue. In addition to the role
that the PDK and PUK will assume, the condition of the people is not
good. The recent exaggerated propaganda has affected the people in particular.
People are now concerned about a US attack against Iraq, they are stockpiling
food and fuel oil, whose price increased by 25 percent after Iraq shut
the valve. Migration has increased as well. The only reason that lately
boats full of refugees have hit the Adriatic and Aegean shores is the
hysteria created by the PUK in the south, without any regard for the
interests of the people. This will just benefit those who desire to
bring about turmoil in Kurdistan.
2. - The Kurdistan Observer - "US Warns Iraq
Not to Take Advantage of Sept Attacks":
The United States has delivered a stern warning to
Iraqi President Saddam Hussein he would pay a heavy price if Baghdad
took advantage of the crisis surrounding the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S.
officials said on Tuesday.
New York / by Evelyn Leopold
The United States has delivered a stern warning to Iraqi President
Saddam Hussein he would pay a heavy price if Baghdad took advantage
of the crisis surrounding the Sept. 11 attacks, U.S. officials said
on Tuesday.
U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte sent a message to Saddam on Sunday through
his U.N. envoy, Mohammed Aldouri, who replied on Monday to the U.S.
Mission to the United Nations, the officials said.
One official said Negroponte's message said: "Don't try to take
advantage of the situation or there will be a price to pay."
"It was a stern warning," the official said, speaking on condition
of anonymity. "There was enough in there to indicate that they
really got the message."
Specifically, Negroponte told Aldouri that Iraq should not make any
moves against Iraqi Kurds, who live in areas generally outside of the
control of the Baghdad government, and keep its hands off its neighbors,
the official said.
Iraq in 1980 attacked Iran and invaded Kuwait a decade later. It rained
missiles on Israel during the 1991 Gulf War when a U.S.-led coalition
drove Baghdad's troops from Kuwait. Aldouri told Reuters an American
emissary had "knocked on the door and we answered it and received
him."
"The Iraqi policy is that we confront the United States openly
so we don't need a crisis to gain benefit," he said. "We have
no aggressive intentions vis-a-vis our neighbors at all."
"Certainly, we are against the war in Afghanistan not because it
is an American war but because it is illegal and against international
law and they have not given any acceptable evidence that Afghanistan
was involved in what happened on September 11," Aldouri said.
Iraq is one of the few countries that has not condemned the suicide
attacks against the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon
outside Washington, as well as the downing of a plane in Pennsylvania.
More than 5,500 people were killed in the attacks, most in New York.
Aldouri told the U.N. General Assembly last week it would be hypocritical
for Iraq to do so in light of U.S. bombing raids against his own country
and 11-year-old U.N. sanctions. But he said messages of condolences
had been sent to individuals in the United States sympathetic to Iraq's
case.
In Doha, Qatar, on Tuesday, Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri said the
United States could target Iraq to settle old scores.
Sabri was speaking before an emergency meeting of the 56-nation Organization
of the Islamic Conference after the United States launched another barrage
of air strikes on Afghanistan.
"It is a hope, more than an expectation, that Muslim countries
should defend themselves and their religious values which are being
targeted by the new U.S.-Zionist war campaign," Sabri told reporters.
3. - Turkish Daily News - "US warns Europe for
emphasis on Turkey":
Visiting Brussels to enhance cooperation against terrorism,
top-level U.S. officials told their European counterparts to give emphasis
to dialogue with Turkey.
ANKARA
The officials, refraining to disclose their identity to the press,
stated an agreement between the United States and Europol is in the
agenda. Europol is as joint organization established for coordination
of police cooperation within the EU framework.
Europe concerned on respect to private life
The Bush administration delegation emphasized on the links
between terrorism and money-washing activities, while Europol officials
confirmed the agreement with the U.S. officials. However, Europol officials
stressed the importance of respect of privacy while determining the
rules of engagement.
The U.S. officials had their own reserves. They said no one can remain
neutral in this war, as a response to the European reservation concerning
human rights. Another American reservation was the emphasis on the difference
between the continental and the American legal system, which remains
an issue to be solved for the cooperation with Eurojust, the justice
cooperation institution of the European Union.
Bush administration officials told the press that the enlargement of
the European Union will provide developments in the candidate countries'
economy, security and human rights issues. The officials mentioned the
special emphasis to relations with Turkey during their speech in this
context.
The U.S. officials stated that dialogue with Turkey has to be improved,
and a special effort has to be spent to overcome sensitive issues, such
as the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP).
Belgian Press notes Turkey's concerns
The Belgian press, meanwhile, harshly criticized the European
Union for sustaining its tradition of remaining passive in critical
international operations.
Le Soir, one of the prominent national newspapers, claimed the only
concern of the European Union was to survive within its borders, not
to be recognized in the global context. The Le Soir editorial called
attention to the fact that U.S. President George W. Bush has never mentioned
the European Union once in recent statements.
The Belgian press noted that the lack of an agreement on the fight against
terrorism among the European countries gives disturbance in the international
arena.
Le Soir also noted the problematic issues in the ESDP, which makes the
European countries lose credibility. It has been noted that the United
States prefer one-to-one relations with NATO countries such as England,
France and Turkey, however, the majority of European countries hesitate
and remain ineffective just like in the previous examples of Bosnia
and Kosovo.
Le Soir mentioned the concerns of Turkey in an analysis on the Arabic
countries. The analysis said Turkey favors a strong fight against terrorism,
and supports the attitudes against religious extremism, however, makes
no comment taking the economics and the stability of neighbour countries
Iraq and Syria into consideration.
The analysis further noted that Turkey's hand is stronger in ESDP negotiations
after the Afghanistan operation.
4. - Associated Press - "Turkey Asks to Send
Troops":
Turkey's government asked parliament Tuesday for permission
to contribute troops to the U.S.-led campaign against terrorism, expressing
concern the fighting could spread beyond Afghan borders.
ANKARA / by Selcan Hacaoglu
Turkey ``must make every contribution within its limits for the
quick success of the operation that has been started before it gets
broadened,'' the government said in a letter to lawmakers.
Although Turkey supports the operation in Afghanistan, it is worried
about being engulfed in a war against its eastern neighbor, Iraq, should
the campaign be extended to other countries suspected of sponsoring
terrorism.
A vote is expected Wednesday on the government's request, which includes
parliamentary approval for an earlier Cabinet decision to let U.S. forces
use Turkish air bases and airspace.
In the meantime, the Turkish army has ordered a unit of 50 special forces
to prepare for deployment, private CNN-Turk television said. Turkey
previously offered its forces for use in training Afghan fighters opposed
to the Taliban.
Turkish troops fought a 15-year war against Kurdish rebels in southeast
Turkey, in mountainous conditions that resemble parts of Afghanistan.
Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit said the United States had not yet made
any specific military demands on Turkey, where polls show 80 percent
of the public oppose military involvement.
However, Turkey could be asked to send troops to Afghanistan under NATO's
Article 5, activated last week at the request of the United States,
which says an attack on one member of the alliance is an attack on all.
As NATO's only Muslim member, Turkey defended the operation as a campaign
against terrorism.
``Those who try to portray this operation as an action against Islam
are contradicting with Islam, which is a religion of peace,'' the government
said. ``The success of this operation is for the good of humanity.''
5. - Milliyet - "Turkey and the US discuss relations
with Iraq":
ANKARA / by Tuncay Ozkan
Columnist Tuncay Ozkan writes on Turkey's stance concerning a possible
attack on Iraq We give a summary of his considerations.
An important problem, has been discussed during the security
summits. America is in favour of striking Iraq after Afghanistan. Turkey
is opposed to this view and is trying to persuade
the US not to attack Iraq. At present Ankara is incredibly busy . From
Turkey's standpoint, we are on the verge of deciding on the most critical
issue probably for the next hundred years. There is great activity in
Ankara due to the 'New Order Wars' waged by the US and her allies.
America may target Iraq and other neighbouring countries
in the course of these wars. Turkey is opposed to this and says that
if the US strikes Iraq, it will be wrong and lead to critical
consequencues for Turkey. In this historical turning point, Turkey agrees
with the US on the definition of terrorists. However, she differs in
the methods and targets during the fight against it. The US had not
listened to what Turkey had to say on the Iran-Iraqi war. What will
happen now? The General Staff which is the most influential organization
in these issues, believes that the wars for the new world order would
create great troubles if they cross the borders of Afghanistan and reach
Iraq or Turkey's other neighbours. The concerns over Pakistan may constitute
an example for this. The possibility of a war with Iraq disturbs Turkey.
The territorial integrity of Iraq cannot be maintained
if there is an attack to this country . This means new formations and
consequently new clashes. Some of the allies want to support the Kurdish
fractions in the region as before and form a new state. As their stances
cannot be seen clearly by Ankara, problems grow. It is not known how
China, India, Russia or Pakistan will react in such a situation. What
is more it is not clear how Germany and France will receive the decision
to attack Iraq and other countries besides Afghanistan.
Turkey has openly declared that she would not allow the
establishment of a Kurdish state. At the moment, Ankara is trying to
stay clear away from the war, and defend the territorial integrity of
Iraq. However, the US who knows the Turkish stance, is conveying her
views to the people and is trying to apply public opinion pressure over
the Turkish Government. Will the US and Turkey reach a compromise over
the issue?
6. - Turkish Daily News - "Fogg: Amendment only
the beginning":
Turkey Representative of the European Union, Karen
Fogg, regards the constitutional amendments recently passed by Turkish
Parliament as insufficient and just a beginning.
ANKARA
In her speech at the "Turkey on the verge of integration with
the EU" seminar, organized by the Turkish Young Businessmen Association
(TUGIAD), Fogg said Turkey had taken the right steps according to the
plan.
Fogg stated that the EU Investment Bank had reserved 450 million Euro
for Turkey, to be used for new structures. However, she said this financial
aid mustn't be conceived as a part of adaptation to the European Union.
Fogg didn't spare hope, however, saying Turkey was a part of the EU
enlargement process, and there will be an acceleration before the new
year. She expressed the European dilemma by mentioning the irregularities
in Turkey. Turkey is the most interesting and most strategical candidate,
which has the most disrupted income distribution, the lowest education
level, and the lowest rate of health budget, Fogg recalled.
Europe wants to see concrete developments
Karen Fogg reiterated Turkey's obstacles to membership
as economic difficulties, Cyprus and the European Security and Defense
Policy (ESDP). Fogg expressed hope on a solution in the long Cyprus
issue, and said the ESDP does not threaten Turkey's interests.
Fogg replied to a question on how the constitutional amendments affected
the membership process, as the developments are basically positive.
"It only constitutes the beginning of the membership process,"
said Fogg. "It isn't possible to call these sufficient. The changes
have to be reflected in the citizens' lives in a concrete manner."
Fogg mentioned the financial aid to Turkey from the European Union,
noting the annual average as 170 million Euros. Some 100 million Euros
of this aid are for basic education, and 50 million Euros are for professional
education and family health.